The blog of dlaa.me

I used .NET 3.5 to write the first version of Insomnia about a year and a half ago. Its purpose in life is to make it easy for anyone to temporarily prevent their computer from going to sleep without having to futz with system-wide power options every time. Insomnia did its job well and people used it in ways I didn't expect: there were requests to allow the window to be minimized to the notification area, so I posted an update a few months later which allowed that. As a result, some people leave Insomnia running for extended periods of time (e.g., many days) and seemed likely to benefit from a version that didn't include the overhead of the .NET Framework, so I created new, native-code 32- and 64-bit versions of Insomnia late last year. These new versions did exactly what they were intended to and were also well received - but there's a catch...

Every couple of weeks or so, Insomnia gets featured by one of those "cool app of the day" sites (which is awesome, so thanks for that!). I never know when it's going to happen, but I can tell exactly when it does because I suddenly get a flurry of comments telling me the native-code versions don't run on Windows XP...

Aside: Many of you may be too young to remember; Windows XP is an operating system Microsoft released about ten years ago - practically an eternity in computing terms! And yet, a lot of people are still running XP... ;)

 

Although I didn't set out to not support Windows XP, I also didn't make a specific effort to support it - and as the saying goes, "if you don't test it, it won't work". Well it didn't work, so I investigated and summarized my findings in a reply on my blog:

I've looked into the Windows XP (SP3) issue just now - the "ordinal 380" error is due to the fact that the LoadIconMetric API isn't supported on OSes prior to Windows Vista. It's easy enough to use the more general LoadIcon API and then native Insomnia starts successfully on XP - but it doesn't show any text. The missing text is because the LM_GETIDEALSIZE message isn't supported prior to Vista, either - and in this case the simpler LM_GETIDEALHEIGHT message isn't a direct substitute. What's more, the current icon doesn't seem to be recognized by XP, either (it shows the generic application icon in Explorer and nothing in the tray). Neither of these issues (text measurement and icon) are overly difficult to fix, but they're also not trivial and I'm not sure how worthwhile it is to spend time and effort to support native Insomnia on Windows XP when the .NET version is reported to work just fine...

That said, I'm open to input here. If a lot of people think this is useful, I'll look into doing the work - but if everyone's happy to use the .NET version on XP, I'm happy to let them. :)

For what it's worth, I don't recall anybody coming back with a compelling reason why XP support is necessary - but after getting another round of XP feedback recently, I decided it was something I should do simply because it comes up so often. Therefore, I'm happy to announce that Insomnia's native 32-bit and 64-bit versions now support Windows XP!

 

Note: With today's update (and in lieu of feedback to the contrary), the native versions of Insomnia are believed to run everywhere the .NET version does. Because there's no functional difference between the native- and managed-code implementations, I'll probably deprecate the .NET version soon. (Please don't get me wrong: I love the significant productivity benefits of using .NET! They're just moot here because I'm already doing the work to maintain the native implementations.)

 

Notes:

• By far the biggest change with this release is the replacement of the SysLink control with one I wrote called IdealSizeStatic. Recall from the previous post that there were two things I liked about SysLink: its ability to return an "ideal size" and its ability to render hyperlinks. Both of these features worked like I wanted, but the lack of support for LM_GETIDEALSIZE on XP was a deal-breaker. When creating IdealSizeStatic, I kept things as simple as possible while also being consistent with how SysLink operates (ex: the use of WM_CTLCOLORSTATIC and WM_SETFONT) just in case I decide to switch back some day. IdealSizeStatic ends up being a pretty general-purpose control that offers WM_GETIDEALSIZE for querying the bounds (width and height) of its text - which is handy for the WPF-like layout pass I implemented in Insomnia.

  Despite my goal of keeping IdealSizeStatic as simple as possible, I didn't want to give up on the hyperlink functionality Insomnia already used, so I did the work to support that scenario. Specifically, if the first character of its window title is '_', IdealSizeStatic assumes it's showing a link, strips off the '_' prefix, and renders the control text in blue. Assuming WS_TABSTOP has also been set, it will show a focus rectangle when relevant and respond to mouse left-button clicks and space bar presses by calling ShellExecuteEx to open the link in the user's preferred web browser.

  IdealSizeStatic won't win any awards for "Win32 control of the year", but it seems to do just enough to be an adequate replacement for SysLink. :)

• Having purged the SysLink control, Insomnia no longer has a dependency on the COMCTL32 common control DLL and the corresponding code to initialize it and incorporate the necessary manifest has been removed.

• The other problem with running on XP was the use of the LoadIconMetric API to retrieve the application icon for the notification area. Fortunately, it's pretty simple to fall back to the LoadImage API instead - though it doesn't offer the same "auto-scaling" magic the original function does.

• Speaking of icons, one curious problem with XP was that Windows Explorer showed the default application icon instead of the custom one embedded in the Insomnia executable. This ends up being because the custom ICO file generator I wrote/use outputs icon images in the 32-bit alpha-blended PNG format and that format isn't supported on Windows XP. This time around, I've also embedded 16x16 and 32x32 icons with the older 24-bit image+mask format. Because this type is recognized by XP, the icon shows up correctly.

  Aside: Unfortunately, XP still has a bit of trouble rendering the bottom-most pixels of the 32x32 icon in the application's property page. But that property page seems to have a variety of troubles with icons - there was a similar issue with the previous version even under Windows 7!

• I've also fixed a couple of minor issues I noticed along the way - none of which should matter much in practice. The new version of the 32-bit and 64-bit builds of Insomnia is 2011-03-19. The version number of the .NET build has not changed and remains 2010-01-29.

 

[Click here to download the 32-bit, 64-bit, and .NET builds of Insomnia along with the complete source code for everything.]

 

I initially put off supporting XP because I figured very few people still used it. However, the steady stream of feedback from XP users finally convinced me there's enough interest to make the effort worthwhile. Windows 7 and Windows Vista users won't see functional differences with this release, but they will benefit from the slightly reduced footprint that comes from breaking the ties to COMCTL32.dll. My IdealSizeStatic control isn't a perfect replacement for the SysLink control, but it gets close enough - and does so without being overly complex.

Windows XP users: I hope you like the new support. Thanks for your patience! :)

In the previous post, I showed how to combine .NET 4's "type embedding" capability with the Managed Extensibility Framework (MEF) to create an application that can be upgraded without breaking existing extensions. In that post, I described the notion of a MEF "contract assembly" thusly:

The contract assembly is the place where the public interfaces of an application live. Because interfaces are generally the only thing in a contract assembly, both the application and its extensions can reference it and it can be published as part of an SDK without needing to include implementation details, too.

The idea is pretty straightforward: an application's public API should be constant even if the underlying implementation changes dramatically. Similarly, the act of servicing an application (e.g., patching it, fixing bugs, etc.) should never require updates to its public contract assembly.

 

Fortunately it's pretty easy to ensure a contract assembly contains only interfaces and .NET Framework classes (which are safe because they're automatically versioned for you). But things get a little tricky when you decide to expose a custom event...

Imagine your application defines an event that needs to pass specific information in its EventArgs. The first thing you'd do is create a subclass - something like MyEventArgs - and store the custom data there. Because the custom event is part of a public interface, it's part of the contract assembly - and because the contract assembly is always self-contained, the definition of MyEventArgs needs to be in there as well. However, while MyEventArgs is probably quite simple, its implementation is... um... an implementation detail [ :) ] and does not belong in the contract assembly.

Okay, no problem, create an IMyEventArgs interface for the custom properties/methods (which is perfectly acceptable for a contract assembly) and then add something like the following to the application (or an extension):

class MyEventArgs : EventArgs, IMyEventArgs

The public interface (in the contract assembly) only needs to expose the following and all will be well:

event EventHandler<IMyEventArgs> MyEvent;

Oops, sorry! No can do:

The type 'IMyEventArgs' cannot be used as type parameter 'TEventArgs' in
the generic type or method 'System.EventHandler<TEventArgs>'. There is no
implicit reference conversion from 'IMyEventArgs' to 'System.EventArgs'.

 

The compiler is complaining there's no way for it to know that an arbitrary implementation of IMyEventArgs can always be converted to an EventArgs instance (which is what the TEventArgs generic type parameter of EventHandler<TEventArgs> is constrained to). Because there's not an obvious way to resolve this ambiguity (the implicit keyword doesn't help because "user-defined conversions to or from an interface are not allowed"), you might be tempted to move the definition of MyEventArgs into the contract assembly and pass that for TEventArgs instead. That will certainly work (and it's not the worst thing in the world) but it feels like there ought to be a better way...

And there is! Instead of using a new-fangled generic event handler, we could instead use a classic .NET 1.0-style delegate in our contract assembly:

/// <summary>
/// Interface for extensions to MyApplication.
/// </summary>
public interface IMyContract
{
    /// <summary>
    /// Simple method.
    /// </summary>
    void MyMethod();

    /// <summary>
    /// Simple event with custom interface-based EventArgs.
    /// </summary>
    event MyEventHandler MyEvent;
}

/// <summary>
/// Delegate for events of type IMyEventArgs.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="o">Event source.</param>
/// <param name="e">Event arguments.</param>
public delegate void MyEventHandler(object o, IMyEventArgs e);

/// <summary>
/// Interface for custom EventArgs.
/// </summary>
public interface IMyEventArgs
{
    /// <summary>
    /// Simple property.
    /// </summary>
    string Message { get; }
}

With this approach, the contract assembly no longer needs to include the concrete MyEventArgs implementation: the delegate above is strongly-typed and doesn't have the same constraint as EventHandler<TEventArgs>, so it works great! With that in place, the implementation details of the MyEventArgs class can be safely hidden inside the extension (or application) assembly like so:

/// <summary>
/// Implementation of a custom extension for MyApplication.
/// </summary>
[Export(typeof(IMyContract))]
public class MyExtension : IMyContract
{
    /// <summary>
    /// Simple method outputs the extension's name and invokes its event.
    /// </summary>
    public void MyMethod()
    {
        Console.WriteLine("MyExtension.MyMethod");
        var handler = MyEvent;
        if (null != handler)
        {
            handler(this, new MyEventArgs("MyEventArgs"));
        }
    }

    /// <summary>
    /// Simple event.
    /// </summary>
    public event MyEventHandler MyEvent;
}

/// <summary>
/// Implementation of a custom interface-based EventArgs.
/// </summary>
class MyEventArgs : EventArgs, IMyEventArgs
{
    /// <summary>
    /// Simple property.
    /// </summary>
    public string Message { get; private set; }

    /// <summary>
    /// Initializes a new instance of the MyEventArgs class.
    /// </summary>
    /// <param name="message">Property value.</param>
    public MyEventArgs(string message)
    {
        Message = message;
    }
}

 

The sample application I've created to demonstrate this practice in action (a simple executable/contract assembly/extension assembly trio) is quite simple and works just as you'd expect. Here's the output:

MyApplication.Run
MyExtension.MyMethod
MyEventArgs

 

[Click here to download the complete source code for the MefContractTricks sample.]

 

Keeping a MEF application's contract assemblies as pure and implementation-free as possible is a good and noble goal. There may be times when it is necessary to make compromises and allow implementation details to sneak into the contract assembly, but the use of custom event arguments does not need to be one of them!

So instead of being generic - and failing - go retro for the win! :)

One of the neat new features in version 4 of the .NET Framework is something called "type equivalence" or "type embedding". The basic idea is to embed at compile time all the type information about a particular reference assembly into a dependent assembly. Once this is done, the resulting assembly no longer maintains a reference to the other assembly, so it does not need to be present at run time. You can read more about type embedding in the MSDN article Type Equivalence and Embedded Interop Types.

Although type equivalence was originally meant for use with COM to make it easier to work against multiple versions of a native assembly, it can be used successfully without involving COM at all! The MSDN article Walkthrough: Embedding Types from Managed Assemblies (C# and Visual Basic) explains more about the requirements for this along with explicit steps to use type embedding with an assembly.

 

Here's a simple interface that is enabled for type embedding:

using System.Runtime.InteropServices;

[assembly:ImportedFromTypeLib("")]

namespace MyNamespace
{
    [ComImport, Guid("1F9BD720-DFB3-4698-A3DC-05E40EDC69F1")]
    public interface MyInterface
    {
        string Name { get; }
        string GetVersion();
    }
}

 

Another thing that's new with .NET 4 (though it had previously been available on CodePlex) is the Managed Extensibility Framework (MEF). MEF makes it easy to implement a "plug-in" architecture for applications where assemblies are loosely coupled and can be added or removed without explicit configuration. While there have been a variety of not-so-successful attempts to create a viable extensibility framework before this, there's general agreement that MEF is a good solution and it's already being used by prominent applications like Visual Studio.

 

Here's a simple MEF-enabled extension that implements - and exports - the interface above:

[Export(typeof(MyInterface))]
public class MyExtension : MyInterface
{
    public string Name
    {
        get { return "MyExtension"; }
    }

    ...
}

And here's a simple MEF-enabled application that uses that extension by importing its interface:

class MyApplication
{
    [ImportMany(typeof(MyInterface))]
    private IEnumerable<MyInterface> Extensions { get; set; }

    public MyApplication()
    {
        var catalog = new DirectoryCatalog(Path.GetDirectoryName(Assembly.GetEntryAssembly().Location));
        var container = new CompositionContainer(catalog);
        container.SatisfyImportsOnce(this);
    }

    private void Run()
    {
        Console.WriteLine("Application: Version={0}", Assembly.GetEntryAssembly().GetName().Version.ToString());
        foreach (var extension in Extensions)
        {
            Console.WriteLine("Extension: Name={0} Version={1}", extension.Name, extension.GetVersion());
        }
    }

    ...
}

 

The resulting behavior is just what you'd expect:

P:\MefAndTypeEmbedding>Demo

Building...
Staging V1...
Running V1 scenario...

Application: Version=1.0.0.0
Extension: Name=MyExtension Version=1.0.0.0

...

 

However, it's important to note that MEF does not isolate an application from versioning issues! Ideally, extensions written for version 1 of an application will automatically load and run under version 2 of that application without needing to be recompiled - but you don't get that for free. There is an easy way to do this, though: avoid making any changes to the contract assembly after v1 is released. :)

Aside: The contract assembly is the place where the public interfaces of an application live. Because interfaces are generally the only thing in a contract assembly, both the application and its extensions can reference it and it can be published as part of an SDK without needing to include implementation details, too.

But because the whole point of version 2 is to improve upon version 1, it's quite likely the contract assembly will undergo some changes along the way. This is where problems come up: assuming the contract assembly was strongly-named and its assembly version updated (as it should be if its contents have changed!), v1 extensions will not load for the v2 application because they won't be able to find the same version of the contract assembly they were compiled against...

Aside: If the contract assembly was not strongly-named, then v1 extensions might be able to load the v2 version - but it won't be what they're expecting and that can lead to problems.

 

Here's an updated version of the original interface with a new Author property for version 2:

using System.Runtime.InteropServices;

[assembly:ImportedFromTypeLib("")]

namespace MyNamespace
{
    [ComImport, Guid("1F9BD720-DFB3-4698-A3DC-05E40EDC69F1")]
    public interface MyInterface
    {
        string Name { get; }
        string GetVersion();
        string Author { get; }
    }
}

 

One way to solve the versioning problem is to ship the v1 contract assembly and the v2 contract assembly along with the v2 application. (Of course, this can be tricky if both assemblies have the same file name, so you'll probably also want to name them uniquely.) Shipping multiple versions of a contract assembly works well enough (it's pretty typical for COM components), but it can also cause some confusion for Visual Studio when it sees multiple same-named interfaces referenced by the v2 application - not to mention the developer burden of managing multiple distinct versions of the "same" interface...

Fortunately, there's another way that doesn't require the v2 application to include the v1 contract assembly at all: type embedding. If the contract assembly is enabled for type embedding and v1 extension authors enable that when compiling, all the relevant bits of the contract assembly will be included with the v1 extension and there will be no need for the v1 contract assembly to be present. What that means is "reasonable" interface changes during development of the v2 application will automatically be handled by .NET and v1 extensions will work properly without any need to recompile/upgrade/etc.!

Aside: By "reasonable" interface changes, I mean removing properties or methods (and therefore not calling the v1 implementations) or adding them (which will throw MissingMethodException for v1 extensions that don't support the new property/method). Changes to existing properties and methods are trickier and probably best avoided as a general rule.

 

The v2 version of the sample application uses the Author property when it's present (for v2 extensions), but gracefully handles the case where it's not (as for v1 extensions):

private void Run()
{
    Console.WriteLine("Application: Version={0}", Assembly.GetEntryAssembly().GetName().Version.ToString());
    foreach (var extension in Extensions)
    {
        string author;
        try
        {
            author = extension.Author;
        }
        catch (MissingMethodException)
        {
            author = "[Undefined]";
        }
        Console.WriteLine("Extension: Name={0} Version={1} Author={2}", extension.Name, extension.GetVersion(), author);
    }
}

 

Here's the v2 version in action:

...

Staging V2...
Running V2 scenario...

Application: Version=2.0.0.0
Extension: Name=MyExtension Version=1.0.0.0 Author=[Undefined]
Extension: Name=MyExtension Version=2.0.0.0 Author=Me

 

[Click here to download the complete source code for the sample application/contract assembly/extensions and demo script used here.]

 

Type embedding and MEF are both fairly simple concepts that add a layer of flexibility to enable some pretty powerful scenarios. As is sometimes the case, the whole is greater than the sum of its parts and combining these two technologies provides an elegant solution to the tricky problem of upgrading an application without breaking existing plug-ins.

If you aren't already familiar with MEF or type embedding, maybe now is a good time to learn! :)

 

PS - My thanks go out to Kevin Ransom on the CLR team for providing feedback on a draft of this post. (Of course, any errors are entirely my own!)

NuGet is all the rage right now, and it seemed like a good time to familiarize myself with it. Conveniently, it just so happened that I had something perfectly suited: my Delay.Web.Helpers assembly which offers ASP.NET web helper-style access to Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3) blobs and buckets. (For context, here's the introductory post for Delay.Web.Helpers and here's a follow-up discussing the addition of container support.)

I'm pleased to say I've just published the following two packages to the public NuGet repository:

• Delay.Web.Helpers - The implementation DLL and its associated XML file for full IntelliSense-based API documentation.

• Delay.Web.Helpers.SampleWebSite - The sample web site for the Delay.Web.Helpers assembly that shows how to use its various APIs.

 

All you need to install to get going is the Delay.Web.Helpers package - that'll get you the binaries and full IntelliSense, too! If you also want some samples to check out, please install the Delay.Web.Helpers.SampleWebSite package.

Because I don't like packages that add random files to my projects, I've configured the Delay.Web.Helpers.SampleWebSite package to install all its sample code under a same-named folder where it won't get mixed up with anyone's existing content. [You're welcome. :) ] I've tweaked the sample to run cleanly in this configuration, so all you need to do is right-click the Delay.Web.Helpers.SampleWebSite folder in Visual Studio's Solution Explorer and choose View in Browser to see it in action.

The sample application lets you browse a previously-configured Amazon S3 account, add, view, and remove buckets, and add, view, and remove files within those buckets. It's not the most fully-featured S3 browser ever, but it does a pretty good job showing off the complete AmazonS3Storage API.

Update at 1:50pm: The sample uses CSHTML (Razor) web pages, so you'll want to add it to a project that supports that file type. From Visual Studio, choose File, New, Web Site..., "ASP.NET Web Site (Razor)". If the resulting web site doesn't run by default due to a missing SQL dependency (i.e., before you add the samples), just comment-out the call to WebSecurity.InitializeDatabaseConnection in _AppStart.cshtml. And if the Razor web site type isn't available at all, please install ASP.NET MVC3 from here.

 

Notes:

• The Delay.Web.Helpers assembly included in the NuGet package is exactly the same DLL I previously released on my blog. If you're already using it successfully, there's no need to switch over to the NuGet version.

• As I add more features in the future, I'll continue releasing bits via my blog and will also update these NuGet packages. So please pick the delivery mechanism you like best (ZIP or NuGet) and feel free to ignore the other one. :)

• Creating your own NuGet package is quite simple and straightforward. The resources I used were the NuGet CodePlex site and the NuGet Gallery. The former has a link to download the NuGet.exe tool you'll need as well as some good documentation on the process of creating a package. The latter is where you go to upload your package - at which point it's automatically visible to the NuGet plug-in for Visual Studio, the ASP.NET MVC3 application admin interface, etc..

 

Creating useful libraries and sharing them with others is a great way to contribute back to the community - but only if you can get the bits into the hands of people who want them! NuGet offers a lightweight packaging mechanism that's so simple, anyone can get started with a minimum investment of time or energy. The NuGet gallery has broad developer reach, is easily searchable, and is managed by someone else - so all you need to worry about is writing a good library!

Less overhead means more development time - thanks, NuGet! :)

Two posts ago, I explained the benefits of pseudo-localization and showed an easy way to implement it for WPF - then said I'd outline how to do the same for Silverlight and Windows Phone 7. In my previous post, I went off on the seeming diversion of implementing a PNG encoder for Silverlight. With this post, I'll fulfill my original promise and unify the previous two posts! As you'll see, the basic principles of my approach to WPF localization translate fairly directly to Silverlight - though some limitations in the latter platform make achieving the same result more difficult. Even though more code and manual intervention are required for Silverlight and Windows Phone 7, the benefits are the same and pseudo-localization remains a great way to identify potential problems early in the development cycle.

For completeness I'll show examples and techniques for all platforms below...

 

Please see the original post for an explanation of the changes shown above.

 

Adding pseudo-localization of RESX resources to a WPF application

1. Add the PseudoLocalizer.cs file from the sample download to the project.

2. Add PSEUDOLOCALIZER_ENABLED to the (semi-colon-delimited) list of conditional compilation symbols for the project (via the Project menu, Properties item, Build tab in Visual Studio).

3. Add the following code somewhere it will be run soon after the application starts (for example, add a constructor for the App class in App.xaml.cs):

   #if PSEUDOLOCALIZER_ENABLED
       Delay.PseudoLocalizer.Enable(typeof(ProjectName.Properties.Resources));
   #endif

4. If necessary: Add a project reference to System.Drawing (via Project menu, Add Reference, .NET tab) if building the project now results in the error "The type or namespace name 'Drawing' does not exist in the namespace 'System' (are you missing an assembly reference?)".

5. If necessary: Right-click Resources.resx and choose Run Custom Tool if running the application under the debugger (F5) throws the exception "No matching constructor found on type 'ProjectName.Properties.Resources'. You can use the Arguments or FactoryMethod directives to construct this type.".

 

Adding pseudo-localization of RESX resources to a Silverlight or Windows Phone 7 application

1. Add the PseudoLocalizer.cs and PngEncoder.cs files from the sample download to the project.

2. Add PSEUDOLOCALIZER_ENABLED to the (semi-colon-delimited) list of conditional compilation symbols for the project (via the Project menu, Properties item, Build tab in Visual Studio).

3. Make the following update to the auto-generated resource wrapper class by editing Resources.Designer.cs directly (the highlighted portion is the primary change):

   #if PSEUDOLOCALIZER_ENABLED
       global::System.Resources.ResourceManager temp =
           new Delay.PseudoLocalizerResourceManager("PseudoLocalizerSL.Resources", typeof(Resources).Assembly);
   #else
       global::System.Resources.ResourceManager temp =
           new global::System.Resources.ResourceManager("PseudoLocalizerSL.Resources", typeof(Resources).Assembly);
   #endif

   In case it's not clear, this change simply duplicates the existing line of code that creates an instance of ResourceManager, modifies it to create an instance of Delay.PseudoLocalizerResourceManager instead, and wraps the two versions in an appropriate #if/#else/#endif so pseudo-localization can be completely controlled by whether or not PSEUDOLOCALIZER_ENABLED is #defined.

   Important: This change will be silently overwritten the next time (and every time!) you make a change to Resources.resx with the Visual Studio designer. Please see my notes below for more information on this Silverlight-/Windows Phone-specific gotcha.

 

 

Adding a pseudo-localizable string (all platforms)

1. Double-click Resources.resx to open the resource editor.

2. Add the string by name and value.

3. Reference it from code/XAML.

4. Silverlight/Windows Phone 7: Re-apply the Delay.PseudoLocalizerResourceManager change to Resources.Designer.cs which was silently undone when the new resource was added.

 

Adding a pseudo-localizable image (WPF only)

1. Double-click Resources.resx to open the resource editor.

2. Click the "expand" arrow for Add Resource and choose Add Existing File....

3. Open the desired image file.

4. Reference it from code/XAML (possibly via BitmapToImageSourceConverter.cs from the sample ZIP).

 

Adding a pseudo-localizable image (all platforms)

1. Rename the image file from Picture.jpg to Picture.jpg-bin.

2. Double-click Resources.resx to open the resource editor.

3. Click the "expand" arrow for Add Resource and choose Add Existing File....

4. Open the desired image file.

5. Reference it from code/XAML (probably via ByteArrayToImageSourceConverter.cs from the sample ZIP).

6. Silverlight/Windows Phone 7: Re-apply the Delay.PseudoLocalizerResourceManager change to Resources.Designer.cs which was silently undone when the new resource was added.

7. Optionally: Restore the image's original file name in the Resources folder of the project and manually update its file name in Resources.resx using a text editor like Notepad. (I've done this for the sample project; it makes things a little clearer and it's easier to edit the image resource without having to rename it each time.)

 

 

There you have it - simple text and image pseudo-localization for WPF, Silverlight, and Windows Phone 7 applications is within your grasp! :) The basic concept is straightforward, though limitations make it a bit more challenging for Silverlight-based platforms. Nevertheless, the time you're likely to save by running PseudoLocalizer early (and often) should far outweigh any inconvenience along the way. By finding (and fixing) localization issues early, your application will be more friendly to customers - no matter what language they speak!

 

[Click here to download the complete source code for PseudoLocalizer, various helper classes, and the WPF, Silverlight, and Windows Phone 7 sample applications shown above.]

 

Notes

• For a brief overview of using RESX resources in a WPF, Silverlight, or Windows Phone 7 application, please see the "Notes" section of my original PseudoLocalizer post. You'll want to be sure the basic stuff is all hooked up and working correctly before adding PseudoLocalizer into the mix.

• The act of using RESX-style resources in a Silverlight application is more difficult than it is in a WPF application (independent of pseudo-localization). WPF allows you to directly reference the generated resources class directly from XAML:

  <Window.Resources>
      <properties:Resources x:Key="Resources" xmlns:properties="clr-namespace:PseudoLocalizerWPF.Properties"/>
  </Window.Resources>
  ...
  <TextBlock Text="{Binding Path=Message, Source={StaticResource Resources}}"/>

  However, that approach doesn't work on Silverlight (or Windows Phone 7) because the generated constructor is internal and Silverlight's XAML parser refuses to create instances of such classes. Therefore, most people create a wrapper class (as Tim Heuer explains here):

  /// <summary>
  /// Class that wraps the generated Resources class (for Resources.resx) in order to provide access from XAML on Silverlight.
  /// </summary>
  public class ResourcesWrapper
  {
      private Resources _resources = new Resources();
      public Resources Resources
      {
          get { return _resources; }
      }
  }

  And reference that instead:

  <UserControl.Resources>
      <local:ResourcesWrapper x:Key="Resources" xmlns:local="clr-namespace:PseudoLocalizerSL"/>
  </UserControl.Resources>
  ...
  <TextBlock Text="{Binding Path=Resources.Message, Source={StaticResource Resources}}"/>

  Obviously, the extra level of indirection adds overhead to every place resources are used in XAML - but that's a small price to pay for dodging the platform issue. :)

• WPF supports private reflection and PseudoLocalizer takes advantage of that to enable a simple, seamless, "set it and forget it" hook-up (via the call to Enable above). Unfortunately, private reflection isn't allowed on Silverlight, so the same trick doesn't work there. I considered a variety of different ways around this, and ultimately settled on editing the generated wrapper class code because it applies exactly the same customization as on WPF. And while it's pretty annoying to have this tweak silently overwritten every time the RESX file is edited, it's simple enough to re-apply and it's easy to spot when reviewing changes before check-in.

• I explained what's wrong with the default behavior of adding an image to a RESX file in my PngEncoder post:

  [...] the technique I used for [WPF] (reading the System.Drawing.Bitmap instance from the resources class and manipulating its pixels before handing it off to the application) won't work on Silverlight. You see, the System.Drawing namespace/assembly doesn't exist for Silverlight! So although the RESX designer in Visual Studio will happily let you add an image to a Silverlight RESX file, actually doing so results in an immediate compile error [...].

  Fortunately, the renaming trick I use above works well for Silverlight and Windows Phone - and WPF, too. So if you're looking to standardize on a single technique, this is the one. :)

  Even if you're devoted to WPF and don't care about Silverlight, you should still consider the byte[] approach: although System.Drawing.Bitmap is easier to deal with, it's not the right format. (Recall from the original PseudoLocalizer post that I wrote an IValueConverter to convert from it to System.Windows.Media.ImageSource.) Instead of loading images as System.Drawing.Bitmap and converting them with BitmapToImageSourceConverter, why not load them as byte[] and convert them with ByteArrayToImageSourceConverter.cs - and save a few CPU cycles by not bouncing through an unnecessary format?

• In addition to the renaming technique for accessing RESX images from Silverlight, there's a similar approach (courtesy of Justin Van Patten) that renames to .wav instead and exposes the resource as a System.IO.Stream. For the purposes of pseudo-localization, the two renaming approaches should be basically equivalent - which led me to go as far as hooking everything up and writing StreamToImageSourceConverter.cs before I realized why the Stream approach isn't viable...

  What it comes down to is an unfortunate API definition - the thing that's exposed by the wrapper class isn't a Stream, it's an UnmanagedMemoryStream! And while that would be perfectly fine as an implementation detail, it's not: the type of the auto-generated property is UnmanagedMemoryStream and the type returned by ResourceManager.GetStream is also UnmanagedMemoryStream. But UnmanagedMemoryStream can't be created by user code in Silverlight (and requires unsafe code in WPF), so this breaks PseudoLocalizer's approach of decoding/pseudo-localizing/re-encoding the image because it means the altered bytes can't be wrapped back up in a UnmanagedMemoryStream to maintain the necessary pass-through behavior!

  If only the corresponding RESX interfaces had used the Stream type (a base class of UnmanagedMemoryStream), it would have been possible to wrap the altered image in a MemoryStream and return that - a technique supported by all three platforms. Without digging into this too much more, it seems to me that the Stream type could have been used with no loss of generality - though perhaps there's a subtlety I'm missing.

  Aside: As a general API design guideline, always seek to expose the most general type that makes sense for a particular scenario. That does not mean everything should expose the Object type and cast everywhere - but it does mean that (for example) APIs exposing a stream should use the Stream type and thus automatically work with MemoryStream, UnmanagedMemoryStream, NetworkStream, etc.. Only when an API needs something from a specific subclass should it use the more specific subclass.

  Be that as it may, I didn't see a nice way of wrapping images in a UnmanagedMemoryStream, and therefore recommend using the byte[] approach instead!

At the end of my previous post about easily pseudo-localizing WPF applications, I said this post would show how to apply those concepts to a Silverlight application. Unfortunately, I seem to have made an off-by-one error: while this post is related to that topic, it is not the post I advertised. But it seems interesting in its own right, so I hope you enjoy it. :)

Okay, so what does a PNG (Portable Network Graphics) image encoder have to do with pseudo-localizing on the Silverlight platform? Almost nothing - except for the fact that I went above and beyond with my last post and showed how to pseudo-localize not just text, but images as well. It turns out the technique I used for that (reading the System.Drawing.Image instance from the resources class and manipulating its pixels before handing it off to the application) won't work on Silverlight. You see, the System.Drawing namespace/assembly doesn't exist for Silverlight! So although the RESX designer in Visual Studio will happily let you add an image to a Silverlight RESX file, actually doing so results in an immediate compile error: The type or namespace name 'Drawing' does not exist in the namespace 'System' (are you missing an assembly reference?)...

 

But all is not lost - there are other ways of adding an image to a RESX file! True, the process is a little wonky and cumbersome, but at least it works. However, the resulting resource is exposed as either a byte[] or a Stream instance - both of which are basically just a sequence of bytes. And because there's no SetPixel method for byte arrays, this is a classic "Houston, we have a problem" [sic; deliberately misquoting] moment for my original approach of pseudo-localizing the image by manipulating its pixels... Hum, what's a girl to do?

Well, those bytes do correspond to an encoded image, so it ought to be possible to decode the image - at which point we could wrap it in a WriteableBitmap and do the pixel manipulation via its Pixels property. After that, we could re-encode the altered pixels back to an image file (remember that the resource data is expected to be the encoded bytes of an image) and things should work as seamlessly as they did for the original scenario. And they actually do! Well, on WPF, at least...

 

Sample PNG file encoded by PngEncoder

 

Not on Silverlight, though. Silverlight will get you all the way to the last step, but that's the end of the line: the platform doesn't expose a way to do the re-encoding. :( As you might guess, this is hardly the first time this issue has come up - a quick web search turns up plenty of examples of people wanting to encode images under Silverlight. The typical recommendation is to find (or write) your own image encoder, and so there are a number of examples of Silverlight-compatible image encoders to be found!

So why did I write my own??

Well, because none of the examples I found was quite what I wanted. The most obvious candidate just flat out didn't work; it crashed on every input I gave it. The runner-up (deliberately) took shortcuts for speed and didn't produce valid output. The third option was released under a license I'm not able to work with. And the fourth was part of a much larger image encoding library I didn't feel like pulling apart. Besides, I release full source code on my blog, and I don't want to be in the business of distributing other peoples' code with my samples. A lot of times it's just easier and safer to code something myself - and I've had a lot of great learning experiences as a result! :)

 

When choosing an image format for re-encoding on the fly, Silverlight makes the decision fairly easy because it supports only two image formats: JPEG and PNG. Because JPEG is a lossy format, it's pretty much a non-starter (we don't want to degrade image quality) and therefore lossless PNG is the obvious choice. Conveniently, the PNG image format is fairly simple - especially if you're willing to punt on (losslessly) compressing the image! All you need to encode a PNG file is a format prefix (8 bytes), a header chunk (5 bytes), an image chunk with the properly encoded pixels, and an end chunk (0 bytes). There's a decent amount of bookkeeping to be done along the way (scanline filtering, compression block creation, two different hash algorithms, etc.), but it's all fairly straightforward. And the PNG specification is well-written and fairly easy to follow - what more could you ask for?

Aside: Giving up on compression may seem like a big deal, but I don't think it is for the scenario at hand. While small file size is important for making the best use of long-term storage, the pseudo-localization scenario creates its PNG file on the fly, loads it, and immediately discards it. The encoded image simply isn't around for very long and so its large size shouldn't matter.

Okay, so PNG encoding isn't rocket science - but I still feel that if I'm going to reinvent the wheel, then at least I should try to contribute something new or interesting to the mix! :)

 

What I've done here is to use IEnumerable everywhere:

namespace Delay
{
    /// <summary>
    /// Class that encodes a sequence of pixels to a sequence of bytes representing a PNG file (uncompressed).
    /// </summary>
    /// <remarks>
    /// Reference: http://www.w3.org/TR/PNG/.
    /// </remarks>
    static class PngEncoder
    {
        /// <summary>
        /// Encodes the specified pixels to a sequence of bytes representing a PNG file.
        /// </summary>
        /// <param name="width">Width of the image.</param>
        /// <param name="height">Height of the image.</param>
        /// <param name="pixels">Pixels of the image in ARGB format.</param>
        /// <returns>Sequence of bytes representing a PNG file.</returns>
        public static IEnumerable<byte> Encode(int width, int height, IEnumerable<int> pixels) { /* ... */ }
    }
}

And IEnumerable isn't just for the public API, it's used throughout the code, too! This is the meaning behind the title of this post: giving up on compression is inefficient from a storage space perspective, but operating exclusively on enumerations is very efficient from a memory consumption and a computational efficiency perspective! Because of that, this class can encode a 20-megabyte PNG file without allocating any more memory than it takes to encode a 1-byte PNG file. What's more, no work is done before it needs to be: if you're streaming a PNG file across a slow transport, the file will be read and encoded only as quickly as the receiver consumes the bytes - and if encoding is aborted mid-way for some reason, no unnecessary effort has been wasted!

This efficiency is possible thanks to the way IEnumerable works and the convenience of C#'s yield return which makes it easy to write code that returns an IEnumerable without explicitly implementing IEnumerator. As a result, the code for PngEncoder is clear and linear with no hint (or visible complexity) of the allocation savings or deferred processing that occur under the covers. Instead, everything communicates in terms of byte sequences - translating one sequence to another inline as necessary. For example, every horizontal line of an encoded PNG image is prefixed with a byte indicating which filtering algorithm was used. These filter bytes aren't part of the original pixels that are passed into the Encode call, so they need to be added. What's cool is that it's easy to write a method to do so - and because it takes an IEnumerable input parameter and returns an IEnumerable result, such a method can be trivially "injected" into any data flow!

 

One particularly handy realization of this technique is demonstrated by a class I called WrappedEnumerable - here's what it looks like to the developer:

/// <summary>
/// Class that wraps an IEnumerable(T) or IEnumerator(T) in order to do something with each byte as it is enumerated.
/// </summary>
/// <typeparam name="T">Type of element being enumerated.</typeparam>
abstract class WrappedEnumerable<T> : IEnumerable<T>, IEnumerator<T>
{
    /// <summary>
    /// Method called to initialize for a new (or reset) enumeration.
    /// </summary>
    protected virtual void Initialize() { }

    /// <summary>
    /// Method called for each byte output by the underlying enumerator.
    /// </summary>
    /// <param name="value">Next value.</param>
    protected abstract void OnValueEnumerated(T value);
}

WrappedEnumerable is useful for PngEncoder because the encoding process makes use of two different hash algorithms: CRC-32 and Adler-32. Long-time readers of this blog know I'm no stranger to hash functions - in fact, I've previously shared code to implement CRC-32 based on the very same PNG specification! But as much as I love .NET's HashAlgorithm, using it here seemed like it might be overkill. HashAlgorithm is ideal for processing large chunks of data at a time, but the sequence-oriented nature of PngEncoder deals with a single byte at a time. So what I did was to create WrappedEnumerable subclasses Crc32WrappedEnumerable and Adler32WrappedEnumerable which override the two methods above to calculate their hash values as the bytes flow through the system! These are both simple classes and work quite well for "injecting" hash math into a data flow. The PNG format puts stores its hash values after the corresponding data, so by the time that value is needed, the relevant data has already flowed through the WrappedEnumerable and the final hash is ready to be retrieved.

 

However, the same cannot be said of the length fields in the PNG specification... Lengths are stored before the corresponding data, and that poses a distinct problem when you're trying to avoid looking ahead: without knowing what data is coming, it's hard to know how much there is! But I'm able to cheat here: because PngEncoder doesn't compress, it turns out that all the internal lengths can be calculated from the original width and height values passed to the call to Encode! So while this is a bit algorithmically impure, it completely sidesteps the length issue and avoids the need to buffer up arbitrarily long sequences of data just to know how long they are.

Aside: After spending so much time celebrating the IEnumerable way of life, this is probably a good time to highlight one of its subtle risks: multiple enumeration due to deferred execution. Multiple enumeration is something that comes up a lot in the context of LINQ - an IEnumerable<byte> is not the same thing as a byte[]. Whereas it's perfectly reasonable to pass a byte[] off to two different functions to deal with, doing the same thing with an IEnumerable<byte> usually results in that sequence being created and enumerated twice! Depending on where the sequence comes from, this can range from inefficient (a duplication of effort) to catastrophic (it may not be possible to generate the sequence a second time). The topic of multiple enumeration is rich enough to merit its own blog post (here's one and here's another and here's another), and I won't go into it further here. But be on the look-out, because it can be tricky!

Further aside: To help avoid this problem in PngEncoder, I created the TrackingEnumerable and TrackingEnumerator classes in the sample project. These are simple IEnumerable/IEnumerator implementations except that they output a string with Debug.WriteLine whenever a new enumeration is begun. For the purposes of PngEncoder, seeing any more than one of these outputs represents a bug!

 

In an attempt to ensure that my PngEncoder implementation behaves well and produces valid PNG files, I've written a small collection of automated tests (included with the download). Most of them are concerned with parameter validation and correct behavior with regard to the IEnumerable idiosyncrasies I mentioned earlier, but the one called "RandomImages" is all about output verification. That test creates 25 PNG files of random size and contents, encodes them with PngEncoder, then decodes them with two different decoder implementations (System.Drawing.Bitmap and System.Windows.Media.Imaging.PngBitmapDecoder) and verifies the output is identical to the input. I've also verified that PngEncoder's PNG files can be opened in a variety of different image viewing/editing applications. (Interesting tidbit: Internet Explorer seems to be the strictest about requiring valid PNG files!) While none of this is a guarantee that all images will encode successfully, I'm optimistic typical scenarios will work well for people. :)

 

[Click here to download the source code for the complete PngEncoder.cs implementation, a simple test application, and the automated test suite.]

 

At the end of the day, the big question is whether my focus (obsession?) with an IEnumerable-centric implementation was justified. From a practical point of view, you could argue this either way - I happen to think things worked out pretty elegantly, but others might argue the code would be clearer with explicit allocations. I'll claim the memory/computational benefits I describe here are pretty compelling (especially in resource-constrained scenarios like Windows Phone), but others could reasonably argue that naïve consumers of PngEncoder are likely to write their code in a way that negates those benefits (ex: by calling ToArray).

However, I'm not going to spend a lot of time second-guessing myself; I think it was a great experience. :) The following sums up my thoughts on the matter pretty nicely:

The road of life twists and turns and no two directions are ever the same. Yet our lessons come from the journey, not the destination. - Don Williams, Jr.

I've previously written about the benefits of localization and shown how to localize Windows Phone 7 applications. The techniques I describe in that post constitute a good workflow that's just as suitable for WPF and Silverlight desktop applications! But even with good processes in place, the way localization is done in the real world has some challenges...

You see, localization can be expensive: hiring people to translate an entire application, re-testing it in the newly supported locale, fixing resulting bugs, etc.. So teams often wait till near the end of the release cycle - after the UI has stabilized - to start localizing the application. This is a perfectly reasonable approach, but there are invariably a few surprises - usually some variation of "What do you mean that string is hard-coded in English and can't be translated??". It sure would be nice if teams could do some kind of low-cost localization in order to identify - and fix - oversights like this long before they turn into problems...

Yep - that process is known as pseudo-localization. What pseudo-localization does is create alternate versions of resource strings by using different characters that look similar enough to the original English characters that text is still readable - but obviously "localized". (This is one of those "a picture is worth a thousand words" moments, so please check out the Wikipedia article or bear with me for just a moment...) Additionally, because some languages tend to have longer phrases than English (German, I'm looking at you!), there's often an additional aspect of string lengthening to simulate that and help detect wrapping, clipping, and the like.

Aside: It's important to remember that the character "translations" are chosen exclusively on the basis of how similar they look to the original character and not on the basis of linguistic correctness, cultural influence, or anything like that!

 

Here's the sample application I created for this post running in its normal English mode. (It's not very sophisticated, but it's good enough for our purposes.) Can you tell if all the strings are properly localizable? Are there any other localization concerns here?

 

Pseudo-localization isn't a new concept and there are a variety of tools out there that do a fine job of it. However, none of the ones I found during a quick search appeared to be free, simple to use, and unencumbered by restrictions (i.e., licensing, distribution, etc.). So I thought it would be fun to write my own and share it with the community as open source under the very permissive Ms-PL license. :)

The class I've created is called PseudoLocalizer and it automatically pseudo-localizes standard .NET RESX-based resources. Using RESX-based resources is the recommend approach for building localizable Silverlight and Windows Phone 7 applications, the recommended approach for building localizable Windows Forms applications, and also a perfectly fine approach for building localizable WPF applications.

Aside: The recommended technique for localizing WPF applications is actually something else, but I have some issues with that approach and won't be discussing it here.

 

I've said it's easy to use PseudoLocalizer: all it takes are three special steps:

1. Add the (self-contained) PseudoLocalizer.cs file from the sample download to your project.

2. Add the following code somewhere it will be run once and run early (ex: the application's constructor):

   #if PSEUDOLOCALIZER_ENABLED
       Delay.PseudoLocalizer.Enable(typeof(ProjectName.Properties.Resources));
   #endif

3. Add PSEUDOLOCALIZER_ENABLED to the list of conditional compilation symbols for your project (via the Project menu, Properties item, Build tab in Visual Studio).

Done! Not only will all localizable strings be automatically pseudo-localized, but images will, too! How does one pseudo-localize an image?? Well, I considered a variety of techniques, but settled on simply inverting the colors to create a negative image. This has the nice benefit of keeping the image dimensions the same (which is sometimes important) as well as preserving any directional aspects it might have (i.e., an image of an arrow pointing left has the same meaning after being "localized").

Aside: I've never seen image pseudo-localization before, but it seems like the obvious next step. Although many images don't need to be localized (ex: a gradient background), some images have text in them or make assumptions that aren't true in all locales (ex: thumbs up means "good"). So it seems pretty handy to know which images aren't localizable! :)

 

Okay, let's see how well you did on the localization quiz! Here's the sample application with PseudoLocalizer enabled:

Hum... While it's clear most of the text was correctly localizable (and therefore automatically pseudo-localized), it appears the lazy developer (uh, wait, that's me...) forgot to put one of the strings in the RESX file: "Goodbye" is hardcoded to English in the XAML. :( Fortunately, the image is localizable, so it can be changed if necessary. Unfortunately, the fixed-width application window seems to be a little too narrow for longer translations (like German) and is clipping two of the pseudo-localized strings! Nuts, I'm afraid this application may need a bit more work before we can feel good about our ability to ship versions for other languages...

 

[Click here to download the complete source code the PseudoLocalizer and the WPF sample application shown above.]

 

Notes:

• What I've described in this post works only on WPF; Silverlight has a couple of limitations that prevent what I've done from working exactly as-is. My next blog post will discuss how to overcome those limitations and use PseudoLocalizer on Silverlight, too!

• The way PseudoLocalizer works so seamlessly is by examining the type of the generated resource class and using (private) reflection to swap in a custom ResourceManager class for the default one. This PseudoLocalizerResourceManager works the same as the default one for loading resources - then it post-processes strings and bitmaps to provide its pseudo-localization effects. Private reflection (i.e., examining and/or modifying the internal data of an object) is generally a bad practice - but I tend to believe it's acceptable here because the target class is simple, its (generated) code is part of the project, and PseudoLocalizer is only ever going to be used as a development tool (i.e., never in a released application).

• For readers who want a brief overview of how to use RESX-resources in WPF, here you go:

  1. Set the Access Modifier to "Public" in the RESX designer so the auto-generated resource property accessors will be accessible to the WPF data-binding system.

  2. Create an instance of the auto-generated RESX class (typically named "Resources") as a WPF-accessible resource:

     <Window.Resources>
         <properties:Resources x:Key="Resources" xmlns:properties="clr-namespace:PseudoLocalizerWPF.Properties"/>
     </Window.Resources>

  3. Create a Binding that references the relevant properties of that resource wherever you want to use them:

     <TextBlock Text="{Binding Path=AlphabetLower, Source={StaticResource Resources}}"/>

• Because RESX files expose images as instances of System.Drawing.Image and WPF deals with System.Windows.Media.ImageSource, I wrote a simple IValueConverter to convert from the former to the latter. (And it's part of the source code download.) Using BitmapToImageSourceConverter follows the usual pattern for value converters:

  1. Create an instance as a resource:

     <delay:BitmapToImageSourceConverter x:Key="BitmapToImageSourceConverter" xmlns:delay="clr-namespace:Delay"/>

  2. Use that resource in the relevant Binding:

     <Image Source="{Binding Path=Image, Source={StaticResource Resources}, Converter={StaticResource BitmapToImageSourceConverter}}"/>

 

Because the cost of fixing defects increases (dramatically) as a product gets closer to shipping, it's important to find and fix issues as early as possible. Localization can be a tricky thing to get all the kinks worked out of, so it's helpful to have good tools around to ensure a team is following good practices. With its low cost, simple implementation and friction-free usage model, I'm hopeful PseudoLocalizer will become another good tool to help people localize successfully!

As part of my previous post announcing the Delay.Web.Helpers assembly for ASP.NET and introducing the AmazonS3Storage class to enable easy Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3) blob access from MVC/Razor/WebMatrix web pages, I made some changes to the BlobStoreApi.cs file it built on top of. BlobStoreApi.cs was originally released as part of my BlobStore sample for Silverlight and BlobStoreOnWindowsPhone sample for Windows Phone 7; I'd made a note to update those two samples with the latest version of the code, but intended to blog about a few other things first...

 

Fragmented response handling

That's when I was contacted by Steve Marx of the Azure team to see if I could help out Erik Petersen of the Windows Phone team who was suddenly seeing a problem when using BlobStoreApi: calls to GetBlobInfos were returning only some of the blobs instead of the complete list. Fortunately, Steve knew what was wrong without even looking - he'd blogged about the underlying cause over a year ago! Although Windows Azure can return up to 5,000 blobs in response to a query, it may decide (at any time) to return fewer (possibly as few as 0!) and instead include a token for getting the rest of the results from a subsequent call. This behavior is deterministic according to where the data is stored in the Azure cloud, but from the point of view of a developer it's probably safest to assume it's random. :)

So something had changed for Erik's container and now he was getting partial results because my BlobStoreApi code didn't know what to do with the "fragmented response" it had started getting. Although I'd like to blame the documentation for not making it clear that even very small responses could be broken up, I really should have supported fragmented responses anyway so users would be able to work with more than 5,000 blobs. Mea culpa...

I definitely wanted to add BlobStoreApi support for fragmented Azure responses, but what about S3? Did my code have the same problem there? According to the documentation: yes! Although I don't see mention of the same "random" fragmentation behavior Azure has, S3 enumerations are limited to 1,000 blobs at a time, so that code needs the same update in order to support customer scenarios with lots of blobs. Fortunately, the mechanism both services use to implement fragmentation is quite similar and I was able to add most of the new code to the common RestBlobStoreClient base class and then refine it with service-specific tweaks in the sub-classes AzureBlobStoreClient and S3BlobStoreClient.

Fortunately, the extra work to support fragmented responses is all handled internally and is therefore invisible to the developer. As such, it requires no changes to existing applications beyond updating to the new BlobStoreApi.cs file and recompiling!

 

Container support

While dealing with fragmented responses was fun and a definite improvement, it's not the kind of thing most people appreciate. People don't usually get excited over fixes, but they will get weak-kneed for new features - so I decided to add container/bucket management, too! Specifically, it's now possible to use BlobStoreApi to list, create, and delete Azure containers and S3 buckets using the following asynchronous methods:

public abstract void GetContainers(Action<IEnumerable<string>> getContainersCompleted, Action<Exception> getContainersFailed);
public abstract void CreateContainer(string containerName, Action createContainerCompleted, Action<Exception> createContainerFailed);
public abstract void DeleteContainer(string containerName, Action deleteContainerCompleted, Action<Exception> deleteContainerFailed);

To be clear, each instance of AzureBlobStoreClient and S3BlobStoreClient is still associated with a specific container (the one that was passed to its constructor) and its blob manipulation methods act only on that container - but now it's able to manipulate other containers, too.

Aside: In an alternate universe, I might have made the new container methods static because they don't have a notion of a "current" container the same way the blob methods do. However, what I want more than that is to be able to leverage the existing infrastructure I already have in place for creating requests, authorizing them, handling responses, etc. - all of which take advantage of instance methods on RestBlobStoreClient that AzureBlobStoreClient and S3BlobStoreClient override as necessary. In this world, it's not possible to have static methods that are also virtual, so I sacrificed the desire for the former in order to achieve the efficiencies of the latter. Maybe one day I'll refactor things so it's possible to have the best of both worlds - but for now I recommend specifying a null container name when creating instances of AzureBlobStoreClient and S3BlobStoreClient when you want to ensure they're used only for container-specific operations (and not for blobs, too).

 

Other improvements

With containers getting a fair amount of love this release, it seemed appropriate to add a containerName parameter to the AzureBlobStoreClient constructor so it would look the same as S3BlobStoreClient's constructor. This minor breaking change means it's now necessary to specify a container name when creating instances of AzureBlobStoreClient. If you want to preserve the behavior of existing code (and don't want to have to remember that "$root" is the magic root container name for Azure (and previous default)), you can pass AzureBlobStoreClient.RootContainerName for the container name.

In the process of doing some testing of the BlobStoreApi code, I realized I hadn't previously exposed a way for an application to find out about asynchronous method failures. While it's probably true that part of the reason someone uses Azure or S3 is so they don't need to worry about failures, things can always go wrong and sometimes you really need to know when they do. So in addition to each asynchronous method taking a parameter for the Action to run upon successful completion, they now also take an Action<Exception> parameter which they'll call (instead) when a failure occurs. This new parameter is necessary, so please provide a meaningful handler instead of passing null and assuming things will always succeed. :)

I've also added a set of new #defines to allow BlobStoreApi users to easily remove unwanted functionality. Because they're either self-explanatory or simple, I'm not going to go into more detail here (please have a look at the code if you're interested): BLOBSTOREAPI_PUBLIC, BLOBSTOREAPI_NO_URIS, BLOBSTOREAPI_NO_AZUREBLOBSTORECLIENT, BLOBSTOREAPI_NO_S3BLOBSTORECLIENT, and BLOBSTOREAPI_NO_ISOLATEDSTORAGEBLOBSTORECLIENT.

Aside: Actually, BLOBSTOREAPI_PUBLIC deserves a brief note: with this release of the BlobStoreApi, the classes it implements are no longer public by default (they're expected to be consumed, not exposed). This represents a minor breaking change, but the trivial fix is to #define BLOBSTOREAPI_PUBLIC which restores things to being public as they were before. That said, it might be worth taking this opportunity to make the corresponding changes (if any) to your application - but that's entirely up to you and your schedule.

The last thing worth mentioning is that I've tweaked BlobStoreApi to handle mixed-case blob/container names properly. Formerly, passing in upper-case characters for a blob name could result in failures for both Azure and S3; with this change in place, that scenario should work correctly.

 

 

New BlobStore and BlobStoreOnWindowsPhone samples

I've updated the combined BlobStore/BlobStoreOnWindowsPhone download to include the latest version of BlobStoreApi with all the changes outlined above. Although there are no new features in either sample, they both benefit from fragmented container support and demonstrate how to use the updated API methods properly.

[Click here to download the complete BlobStore source code and sample applications for both Silverlight 4 and Windows Phone 7.]

 

New Delay.Web.Helpers release and updated sample

The Delay.Web.Helpers download includes the latest version of BlobStoreApi (so it handles fragmented containers) and includes new support for container management in the form of the following methods on the AmazonS3Storage class:

/// <summary>
/// Lists the blob containers for an account.
/// </summary>
/// <returns>List of container names.</returns>
public static IList<string> ListBlobContainers() { ... }

/// <summary>
/// Creates a blob container.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="containerName">Container name.</param>
public static void CreateBlobContainer(string containerName) { ... }

/// <summary>
/// Deletes an empty blob container.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="containerName">Container name.</param>
public static void DeleteBlobContainer(string containerName) { ... }

As I discuss in the introductory post for Delay.Web.Helpers, I'm deliberately matching the existing WindowsAzureStorage API with my implementation of AmazonS3Storage, so these new methods look and function exactly the same for both web services. As part of this release, I've also updated the Delay.Web.Helpers sample page to show off the new container support as well as added some more automated tests to verify it.

[Click here to download the Delay.Web.Helpers assembly, its complete source code, all automated tests, and the sample web site.]

 

Summary

While I hadn't thought to get back to blobs quite so soon, finding out about the fragmented response issue kind of forced my hand. But all's well that ends well - I'm glad to have added container supported to Delay.Web.Helpers because that means it now has complete blob-related feature parity with the WindowsAzureStorage web helper and that seems like a Good Thing. What's more, I got confirmation that the Windows Azure Managed Library does not support Silverlight, so my BlobStoreApi is serving duty as an unofficial substitute for now. [Which is cool! And a little scary... :) ]

Whether you're using Silverlight on the desktop, writing a Windows Phone 7 application, or developing a web site with ASP.NET using MVC, Razor, or WebMatrix, I hope today's update helps your application offer just a little more goodness to your users!

Microsoft released a bunch of new functionality for its web platform earlier today - and all of them are free! The goodies include new tools like WebMatrix, ASP.NET MVC3 and the Razor syntax, and IIS Express - as well updates to existing tools like the Web Platform Installer and Web Deploy. These updates work together to enable a variety of new scenarios for the web development community while simultaneously making development simpler and more powerful. I encourage everyone to check it out!

 

Web Helpers...

One of the things I find particularly appealing is the idea of "web helpers": chunks of code that can be easily added to a project to make common tasks easier - or enable new ones! Helpers can do all kinds of things, including integrating with bit.ly, Facebook, PayPal, Twitter, and so-on. For an example of cool they are, here's how easy it is to add an interactive Twitter profile section to any ASP.NET web page [and it's even easier if you don't customize the colors :) ]:

@Twitter.Profile(
    "DavidAns",
    height:150,
    numberOfTweets:20,
    scrollBar:true,
    backgroundShellColor:"#8ec1da",
    tweetsBackgroundColor:"#ffffff",
    tweetsColor:"#444444",
    tweetsLinksColor:"#1985b5")

Which renders as:

You can see other examples of useful web helpers (including charting, cryptography, Xbox gamer cards, ReCaptcha, and more) in the ASP.NET social networking tutorial.

 

Aside: While web helper assemblies like System.Web.Helpers and Microsoft.Web.Helpers are obviously easy to use from ASP.NET Razor and ASP.NET MVC, what's neat (and not immediately obvious) is that they don't need to be tied to those technologies. At the end of the day, helper assemblies are normal .NET assemblies and some of their functionality can be used equally well in non-web scenarios!

 

The inspiration...

One of the web helpers that caught my eye when I was looking around is the Windows Azure Storage Helper which makes it easy to incorporate Windows Azure blob and table access into ASP.NET applications. If you happened to be reading this blog a few months ago, you might remember that I already have some experience working with Windows Azure and Amazon S3 blobs in the form of my BlobStore Silverlight application and BlobStoreOnWindowsPhone Windows Phone 7 sample.

When I wrote BlobStore for Silverlight, I didn't see any pre-existing libraries I could make use of (the Windows Azure Managed Library didn't (and maybe still doesn't?) work on Silverlight and there were some licensing concerns with the S3 libraries I came across), so I implemented my own support for what I needed: list/get/set/delete support for blobs on Windows Azure and Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3). But now that we're talking about ASP.NET, web helpers run on the server and the Windows Azure Storage Helper is able to leverage the Windows Azure Managed Library for all the heavy lifting so it can expose things in a clean, web helper-suitable way (via the WindowsAzureStorage static class and its associated methods).

That's good stuff and the WindowsAzureStorage helper seems quite comprehensive - but what about customers who are already using Amazon S3 and can't (or won't) switch to Windows Azure? Well, that's where I come in. :) I'd thought it would be neat to create my own web helper assembly, and this seemed like the perfect opportunity - so I've created the Delay.Web.Helpers web helper assembly by leveraging the work I'd already done for BlobStore. This enables basic list/get/set/delete functionality for S3 blobs without a much additional effort and seems like a great way to help out more customers!

 

The API...

Most people don't like having many different ways to do the same thing, so I decided early on that the fundamental API for AmazonS3Storage would be the same as that already exposed by WindowsAzureStorage. That led directly to the following API (the two "secret key" properties have been renamed to match Amazon's terminology, but they're used exactly the same):

namespace Delay.Web.Helpers
{
    public static class AmazonS3Storage
    {
        public static string AccessKeyId { get; set; }
        public static string SecretAccessKey { get; set; }

        public static IList<string> ListBlobs(string bucketName);
        public static void UploadBinaryToBlob(string blobAddress, byte[] content);
        public static void UploadBinaryToBlob(string blobAddress, Stream stream);
        public static void UploadBinaryToBlob(string blobAddress, string fileName);
        public static void UploadTextToBlob(string blobAddress, string content);
        public static byte[] DownloadBlobAsByteArray(string blobAddress);
        public static void DownloadBlobAsStream(string blobAddress, Stream stream);
        public static void DownloadBlobToFile(string blobAddress, string fileName);
        public static string DownloadBlobAsText(string blobAddress);
        public static void DeleteBlob(string blobAddress);
    }
}

And because I wanted to be sure AmazonS3Storage could really be dropped into an application that already used WindowsAzureStorage, I did exactly that: I downloaded the WindowsAzureStorage sample application, performed a find-and-replace on the class name, updated the names of the two "secret key" properties, removed some unsupported functionality, and then verified that the sample ran and worked correctly. (It did!)

 

The enhancements...

While I think the WindowsAzureStorage APIs works well for listing and reading existing blobs, it's not immediately clear what a blobAddress string is made up of or how to create one, so I might get a little confused in scenarios that create blobs from scratch... It so happens that the blobAddress structure is ContainerName/BlobName (which I preserve in AmazonS3Storage), but that feels like an implementation detail developers focusing on the upload scenario shouldn't need to know. Therefore, I've also exposed the following set of methods with separate bucketName and blobName parameters (and otherwise the same signatures):

public static void UploadBinaryToBlob(string bucketName, string blobName, byte[] content);
public static void UploadBinaryToBlob(string bucketName, string blobName, Stream stream);
public static void UploadBinaryToBlob(string bucketName, string blobName, string fileName);
public static void UploadTextToBlob(string bucketName, string blobName, string content);
public static byte[] DownloadBlobAsByteArray(string bucketName, string blobName);
public static void DownloadBlobAsStream(string bucketName, string blobName, Stream stream);
public static void DownloadBlobToFile(string bucketName, string blobName, string fileName);
public static string DownloadBlobAsText(string bucketName, string blobName);
public static void DeleteBlob(string bucketName, string blobName);

I'm optimistic this provides a somewhat easier model for developers to work with, but I encourage folks to use whatever they think is best! :)

Aside: I hadn't previously needed create/list/delete functionality for buckets, so the corresponding methods are not part of today's release. However, I expect them to be rather easy to add and will likely do so at a future date.

 

The testing...

To try to ensure I hadn't made any really dumb mistakes, I wrote a complete automated test suite for the new AmazonS3Storage class. With the exception of verifying each ArgumentNullException for null parameters, the test suite achieves complete coverage of the new code and runs as a standard Visual Studio test project (i.e., here's an example of using web helpers "off the web").

 

The sample...

As much fun as testing is, a sample is often the best way to demonstrate how an API is used in practice - so I also put together a (very) quick Razor-based web site to provide simple list/get/set/delete access to an arbitrary Amazon S3 account/bucket:

 

The example...

Using the Delay.Web.Helpers web helper is as easy as you'd expect; here's the piece of code that lists the bucket's contents (which is only as long as it is because it handles invalid credentials and empty buckets):

@if (configured) {
    <p class="Emphasized">
        Contents of bucket <strong>@bucket</strong>:
    </p>
    var blobs = AmazonS3Storage.ListBlobs(@bucket);
    if (blobs.Any()) {
        foreach (var blobAddress in blobs) {
            <p>
                <a href="@Href("DownloadBlob", new { BlobAddress = blobAddress})">@blobAddress.Split('/').Last()</a>
                -
                <a href="@Href("DeleteBlob", new { BlobAddress = blobAddress})" class="Subdued">[Delete]</a>
            </p>
        }
    } else {
        <em>[Empty]</em>
    }
} else {
    <p>
        <strong>[Please provide valid Amazon S3 account credentials in order to use this sample.]</strong>
    </p>
}

The one "gotcha" that's easy to forget (and that causes compile errors when you do!) is the using statement that goes at the top of the .cshtml file and tells Razor where to find the implementation of the AmazonS3Storage class:

@using Delay.Web.Helpers

 

The download...

[Click here to download the Delay.Web.Helpers assembly, its complete source code, all automated tests, and the sample web site.]

To use the Delay.Web.Helpers assembly in your own projects, simply download the ZIP file above, unblock it (click here for directions on "unblocking" a file), extract its contents to disk, and reference Delay.Web.Helpers.dll - or copy the Delay.Web.Helpers.dll and Delay.Web.Helpers.xml files to wherever they're needed (typically the Bin directory of a web site).

Aside: Technically, the Delay.Web.Helpers.xml file is optional - its sole purpose is to provide enhanced IntelliSense (specifically: method and parameter descriptions) in tools like Visual Studio. If you don't care about that, feel free to omit this file!

To play around with the included sample web site, just open the folder Delay.Web.Helpers\SourceCode\SampleWebSite in WebMatrix or Visual Studio (as a web site) and run it.

To have a look at the source code for the Delay.Web.Helpers assembly, tweak it, run the automated tests, or open the sample web site (a slightly different way), just open Delay.Web.Helpers\SourceCode\Delay.Web.Helpers.sln in Visual Studio.

 

The summary...

Being able to repurpose code is a great thing! In this case, all it took to convert my existing BlobStoreApi into an ASP.NET Razor/MVC-friendly web helper was writing a few thin wrapper methods. With a foundation like that, all it takes is some testing to catch mistakes, a quick sample to show it all off, and all of a sudden you've got yourself the makings of a snazzy blog post - and a new web helper! :)

Over the holiday break, I was asked to create a program to "speak" (via text-to-speech) simple sentences that were provided on the command-line. None of the available offerings were "just right" for the customer's scenario, so I was asked if I knew of any other options... Although I hadn't used it before, I figured the .NET System.Speech assembly/classes would make solving this task pretty easy, so I decided to give it a quick try.

And about three minutes later, I was done [ :) ]:

using System.Speech.Synthesis;

class Program
{
    static void Main(string[] args)
    {
        (new SpeechSynthesizer()).Speak(string.Join(" ", args));
    }
}

 

Because that was so easy, it felt like cheating; I decided to add support for a few more features to round out the offering and turn the whole thing into a free tool and blog post. The program I've written is called SayIt and is a window-less .NET 4 application to speak arbitrary text from the command line (or from a file) while allowing the user to make simple customizations (such as gender and volume).

Here's the "documentation" that shows up when SayIt is run without any parameters:

Use the command line to tell SayIt what to say and how to say it.

SayIt.exe
    [--Gender Male|Female|Neutral]
    [--Volume Silent|ExtraSoft|Soft|Medium|Loud|ExtraLoud|Default]
    [--Rate ExtraSlow|Slow|Medium|Fast|ExtraFast]
    [--Text <Text.txt>]
    [--SSML <SSML.xml>]
    [<Text to say>]

Examples:
    SayIt.exe Hello world
    SayIt.exe --Gender Female --Text C:\My\File.txt

Version 2011-01-04
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/delay/

 

For fun, I created the following icon (if you don't recognize it, here's a hint):

 

When you run SayIt with the proper parameters (combine them in any order!), SayIt uses the Windows text-to-speech engine to speak the text using the default output device. It does this without creating or showing a window, so other programs can make use of SayIt without distracting the user. Alternatively, SayIt can be called from batch files to provide status updates for custom scripts and the like. Simple text can be passed directly on the command line, while more complicated (or lengthy) text can be passed in a file (via the --Text option).

Here are a few ideas to get you started:

SayIt Build completed

SayIt Processing file 12 of 25

SayIt You've got mail!

SayIt I'm sorry, Dave. I'm afraid I can't do that.

SayIt Barbra Streisand

 

Aside from the simple gender, volume, and rate customizations that can be done on the command-line, the most likely tweak is fine-tuning the pronunciation of a particular word or words. (Though most sentences are quite understandable by default, some words come out a little garbled!) Fortunately, there's a W3C standard for customizing pronunciation and SayIt supports that standard (via the --SSML parameter): Speech Synthesis Markup Language.

SSML is a simple, XML-based syntax for controlling the behavior of text-to-speech applications like SayIt. I won't go into the gory details here (the SSML specification has everything you need), but I will highlight the phoneme element in the form of a simple sample that's part of the small SayIt test suite:

<!-- IPA pronunciations based on http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/tomato -->
<speak version='1.0' xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2001/10/synthesis' xml:lang='en-US'>
  You say <phoneme alphabet="ipa" ph="təˈmaɪto">tomato</phoneme>.
  I say <phoneme alphabet="ipa" ph="təˈmeɪto">tomato</phoneme>.
</speak>

 

Although technology hasn't come quite as far as Arthur C. Clarke envisioned in 2001: A Space Odyssey, it's still pretty amazing what the common household computer is capable of. Speech - and other forms of "natural input" - can be a great way to personalize the computing experience and the ease with which SayIt can be incorporated into existing programs and scripts should make it a natural fit for many scenarios. Instead of using an inefficient polling approach to find out when your tasks finish, let the computer tell you - literally! :)

 

[Click here to download the .NET 4 SayIt application, complete source code, and simple tests.]

 

Notes:

• The default English install of Windows 7 comes with only one "voice", Microsoft Anna, which is female. Therefore, even if you specifically request a male voice (via --Gender Male or SSML), you'll probably still hear Anna. This is not a bug in SayIt. :)
• SayIt exposes the same volume settings that the System.Speech assembly does (via the PromptVolume enumeration), but you probably won't be able to increase the speech volume because the default setting is "ExtraLoud". This is not a bug in SayIt, either.
• The speech engine is pretty good about spelling out acronyms like you'd want, but if you ever need to force the issue, just prefix the relevant word/acronym with the '-' character:

  SayIt Register your car at the -DOT.